A Rising ‘Wealth-Poverty Gap’: The Way Prosperity and Deprivation Now Sit Side by Side in Across England.
In Nunsthorpe, inhabitants live in properties only a few metres from their wealthier counterparts in the adjacent Scartho. A 1.8-metre-high barricade literally separates the two areas in the town of Grimsby, sealing off paths and streets that previously linked them.
“It’s the posh-poor divide,” remarked Serenity Colley, 37. “It has been there since I’ve known. I doubt they’ll bring it down because I suspect they’ll want to mix with us.”
A Stark National Picture
Data from government figures shows the extent of inequality can run, sometimes across little more than a short distance of tarmac, a hedge row or a wall. Decades of austerity and lack of funding have led to a situation where a majority of local authorities now have a locality ranking as one of the most deprived in the country.
This spread of deprivation has led to a sharp rise in the number of locations where disadvantaged and well-off residents find themselves living side by side. Just a few years ago, just 65 of the most deprived areas adjoined one of the least deprived. That figure increased to 119 in the latest data.
A Wall That Divides More Than Land
In Grimsby, the gap is the biggest in the UK and painfully apparent. The barrier is much more than a metaphorical divide; it creates very real difficulties for everyday life.
- School runs that ought to take a quarter of an hour turn into an hour-long journey.
- Access to key amenities like supermarkets, educational facilities and employment centres is hindered.
- The site often sees antisocial behaviour, with reports of litter being dumped over the wall and other problems.
“People strive to maintain a nice house and nice garden, and then you live opposite that,” said one local, motioning at the corroded metal wall.
Community Spirit Amidst Challenges
At Centre4, staff emphasise that support does not recognise postcodes. “Where you live is not a reliable indicator of your level of challenge,” said director a community leader.
Regardless of ranking in the lowest 10% for multiple deprivation indicators, the estate retains a fierce loyalty and sense of community among its inhabitants. By contrast, the neighbouring area ranks among the least deprived 10% overall.
Echoes Elsewhere: Stanhope in Ashford
This pattern is repeated nationally. The Stanhope area in Ashford, Kent, a mid-century housing development, is in the 10% most deprived of areas in the country. It is immediately adjacent by large houses built in the early 2000s that sit in the top 10% for employment and quality of surroundings.
“They might have bigger houses, but here there’s more community,” said Phil Hockley, aged 63. “You’ll probably find a lot of people over there don’t even speak to each other.”
The economic gap is evident: an average three-bedroom house costs about £275,000 on the Stanhope estate, while on the other side equivalent homes fetch about £410,000.
Residents describe a palpable feeling of neglect. “Our neighbourhood is neglected,” said holistic health worker Susan Riley-Nevers. “In this area our facilities have gradually disappeared, and the majority of the community problems here are to do with financial hardship.”
The increase in these ‘inequality borders’ presents a picture of an increasingly segregated society, where wealth and deprivation are frequently awkwardly in close proximity.