🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.